|
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF STATE WORKFORCE BOARD CHAIRS
___________________________________________________
DRAFT
U.S. Senate
Dear Senator:
As the Senate moves to consider
Senate Bill 1627, the National Association of State Workforce Board,
which represents the private sector executives who chair the state workforce
investment boards established under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA),
wishes to express several concerns based on our March, 2003 Recommendations for Reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act.
We believe that S 1627 contains many very valuable features that should
be maintained. Our focus in this letter is on those areas where changes
will strengthen the demand-driven mission of the system.
We would urge you to
consider the following priorities before passage of the Senate’s bill:
-
The private sector majority and chair on both state
and local boards are critical to a demand driven system and need to
be maintained. At the same time, if boards are to be effective and
focused on strategic issues, expanding their membership to include
all one stop partner agencies risks making them unwieldy and supply
side oriented.
-
The Association supports the concept of “infrastructure
funding” for the one-stop system. We do not, however, support provisions
that prescribe how this should be done. States should have the authority
to work with local officials on how this can best be achieved in each
state.
-
Consolidate funding streams for adult programs,
including adult, dislocated worker programs under WIA Title I and
employment service programs, and remove the fire walls between youth
and adult programs that prevent states from directing these resources
to the most critical needs in local communities.
-
Provide expanded waiver authority to governors to
design systems to meet unique needs of their states and communities.
With the economy in a continuing state of change, governors need the
flexibility to design workforce systems that can adapt to these changes.
Legislation that “hardwires” the system with prescriptive provisions
quickly becomes outdated.
-
Provide governors the authority, in consultation
with local elected officials, to designate service delivery regions
based on regional labor markets or state-wide designation with community-based
delivery structures. While the Association supports the increased
focus on the performance of service delivery regions in both S 1627
and HR 1612 as a key factor in local area designation, we believe
governors need greater discretion in designating local areas to reflect
the unique economic situation of each state.
We appreciate
your consideration of our recommendations and would invite the opportunity
to discuss them with you and your staff in greater detail. To contact
the Association, please call me directly on …… or call Samuel Lei ken
at NGA on 202-624-7804.
Sincerely,
Gwyn Harvey
Chair
|